I've combed through a
number of early education resources in the past month, all to
bring you the best of the bunch in this edition of the Pre-K
Picks. These picks run the gamut from polling to teacher
education to the relationship between young children's education
and health.
1. New database of
evaluated early childhood programs
Child Trends has a
new online database called LINKS
(Lifecourse Interventions to Nurture Kids Successfully) that
features over 200 evaluated programs that enhance children's
development. One of the categories is "Child Care/Early
Childhood Education."
2. New blog on child care and early education policy
The Center for Law
and Social Policy (CLASP) recently launched a new website section
that puts news, briefs, research, and data on pre-k, child care,
and Head Start in an easy-to-use weblog format.
3. Link between
health insurance and school readiness
While this brief
(PDF) from the Campaign for Children's Health Care is not new,
it is timely given the current debate surrounding the State
Children's Health Insurance Program. The brief cites studies in
California and Missouri that show how having health insurance
improves school attendance. While the focus is on K-12 students,
it is easy to apply the logic to pre-k children. The brief also
discusses how having access to health professionals can help
parents with their children's behavioral issues and contribute
to children's social and emotional development. Finally, health
coverage can also lead to early detection of developmental
problems, allowing early childhood professionals to intervene
earlier.
4. Is teacher
education related to effectiveness of pre-k?
Commentary
by the Foundation for Child Development examines why some recent
studies have found little or no relationship between teacher
education and outcomes on children in pre-k. The authors raise
the following points:
-
Since there is so
much variability in the rigor of teacher education programs and
certification requirements, the lack of a relationship may be
due to the inadequate preparation that pre-k teachers
received.
-
Teachers' performance
is also influenced by the resources and management of the
programs.
-
Studies reviewed by
the authors tend not to examine non-academic outcomes.
-
The studies may not
have given children enough time for effects to appear. For
example, the time between assessments in one study ranged from
three to eight months.
-
Can we expect
teachers with less than a bachelor's degree to put new research
in early education into practice?
To the last point, a
report
(PDF) by the U.K.-based Teaching and Learning Research Programme
(TLRP) describes seven ingredients to effective teaching
practices in the early years and emphasizes the need for a
highly sophisticated staff: "More highly-qualified staff perform
more and better interventions. In the presence of trained
teachers, less qualified staff also become more active and
effective."
5. Low-income
children and pre-k enrollment
The National Center
for Children in Poverty (NCCP) just updated their online
database with the latest Census data on poor and low-income
children. It shows that 43 percent of three- and four-year-old
children live in low-income families, defined as 200 percent of
the federal poverty level, or an income of $41,300 for a family
of four. Considering that the combined enrollment rate of state
pre-k and Head Start stands at 30 percent for four year
olds and 10 percent for three year olds, states have a long way
to go just to fully fund targeted pre-k programs. For instance,
53 percent of Arizona children age three through five are
low-income, and only 18 percent of the state's four year olds
are in pre-k or Head Start.
The NCCP website also
includes a report
(PDF) on the 10-year (1996-2006) national and state trend data
on low-income children.
6. Can pre-k reduce
poverty?
An article
(PDF) in the latest issue of Future of Children argues
for an intensive, national pre-k program targeted to
"economically disadvantaged" three and four year olds as an
anti-poverty strategy. Even if such a program does not achieve
the level of impact that the Perry Preschool Program did, the
authors estimate that it would have a benefit-cost ratio between
4:1 and 7:1 and would reduce poverty by 5 to 15 percent. They
also point out that this program would confer short-term
economic benefits by allowing more parents to enter the
workforce.
Key features of this
hypothetical program include:
-
College-educated
teachers;
-
A maximum class size
of 12 and a child-adult ratio of 6:1;
-
Three hours of
developmentally-appropriate instruction , with additional
"wrap-around" child care hours for working families;
-
A parent involvement
component;
-
Comprehensive
services similar those in Head Start;
-
Free access to
families with incomes up to 150 percent of the federal poverty
threshold; and
-
A sliding scale for
fees charged to higher income families.
The authors estimate
that the program would cost $8,000 per child annually, with an
additional $4,000 per child annually for "wrap-around" services.
The cost of the program, after taking into account current
spending, would be $20 billion a year.
7. Treating young
children with ADHD symptoms
Significant ADHD
symptoms in young children are related to expulsion or
suspension from pre-k or center-based care. A study
funded by the National Institute of Mental Health and conducted
by Project Achieve at
Lehigh University shows that non-medical treatments of young
children (three to five years old) with ADHD symptoms can be
effective. The study randomly assigned 135 children enrolled in
center- or school-based early education programs to two groups.
In one, parents attended education workshops on child
development and parenting. In the other, parent workshops were
supplemented by more individualized interventions that were
based on consultations with parents and teachers at home and at
the school or center. Data was analyzed one year after the
intervention.
Children in both
groups made significant, and similar, gains in behavioral,
social, and emotional, and pre-literacy skills. While parent
education combined with individualized interventions was no more
effective than parent education alone, the authors cautioned
against making any conclusions about their relative
effectiveness because only half of the families assigned to the
more intensive group received all components of that
intervention. Also, it's possible that significant differences
may emerge after a longer period of time.
8. Web-based planning
resources for pre-k
Two statewide efforts
- in California and Pennsylvania - may provide models to support
pre-k planning and development in other states.
The David and Lucile
Packard Foundation is backing the creation of a website, Plan 4 Preschool, that
provides a "one-stop shop" for educators, early childhood
professionals, and policymakers to find information and
resources about pre-k, particularly in California. The website
includes basic statistics and demographic information, planning
resources for those interested in creating pre-k programs, a
collection of research studies, and profiles of each county's
efforts in early care and education.
The Pennsylvania
Early Learning Keys to Quality supports improvements in early
learning programs across the state through a website
that offers a number of resources to help schools and providers
create "model pre-k classrooms."
Did you receive this
message from a friend? Sign up for the Pre-K Picks and other
updates!
This message was sent to [email address]. Visit your subscription management page to modify your email communication preferences or update your personal profile. To stop ALL email from Pre-K Now, click to remove yourself from our lists (or reply via email with "remove or unsubscribe" in the subject line).
Pre-K Now
1025 F
Street NW
Suite 900
Washington, DC
20004
www.preknow.org