This month's Picks bring
together research and resources from California, Hawaii, New
Jersey, and even Japan on topics including English Language
Learners, providing pre-k in child care centers, teacher
competencies, and the effects of teachers' work environments on
their students.
Looking ahead, on April
23 Pre-K Now will release "Leadership Matters: Governors' Pre-K
Proposals Fiscal Year 2009." This annual, state-by-state
analysis of governors' pre-k budget recommendations salutes true
leaders on pre-k and shines a light on those whose support
changed with the economic winds. Don't miss it!
1. New website
features planning tools for pre-k programs
With support from the
Lucile and David Packard Foundation, researchers at the American
Institutes for Research have launched the Early Learning Systems website.
Filled with resources to
help plan and implement pre-k programs in California,
policymakers and program administrators can use its county and
state demographic information and enrollment data to estimate
the supply of and demand for pre-k programs.
The website also
provides calculator that allows visitors to estimate the cost of
a pre-k program using real data and reflecting their local
policies and context. Visitors can customize variables such as:
After obtaining a cost
estimate, visitors can find resources for the all-important
tasks of financing their proposed programs and evaluating them
once they've become a reality.
2. Brief dispels
common myths about young English Language Learners
The rising number of
English Language Learners (ELLs) attending pre-k programs adds
urgency to the search for proven practices to ensure that these
children get the most out of high-quality early childhood
education.
Using evidence from
neuroscience, research on language development, and program
evaluations, the Foundation for Child Development has produced a
brief that promotes
research-based - rather than myth-based - strategies for
educating young ELLs.
The myths dispelled
include:
Learning two
languages during the early childhood years will overwhelm and
confuse a child or delay their acquisition of English.
Total English
immersion is the best way for young ELLs to acquire English.
Schools should
provide English-only instruction because they don't have the
capacity to provide instruction in all of the languages
represented by the children.
Native English
speakers will experience academic and language delays if they
are enrolled in dual-language programs.
Spanish-speaking
Latinos show social and academic delays when entering
kindergarten.
Latino ELLs are
less likely to be enrolled in pre-k because of their families'
cultural values.
3. One-stop shopping
for works based on the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study
The National Center for
Education Statistics has compiled a comprehensive bibliography of reports, journal
articles, books, dissertations and other data products related
to the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study (ECLS), including the
"Birth" and "Kindergarten" cohorts. ECLS has collected data on
two overlapping, nationally representative samples of U.S.
children in order to facilitate research on children's
development. Children in the Birth cohort were born in 2001 and
tracked until they entered kindergarten. Children in the
Kindergarten cohort entered kindergarten in the fall of 1998 and
have been tracked ever since.
4. Pennsylvania
agency compiles early education research
One way state agencies
can promote the use of research-based practices is to serve as a
clearinghouse for the growing body of knowledge concerning early
education. The Office of Child Development and Learning (OCDEL)
in Pennsylvania regularly updates its research resources,
including findings on pre-k-through-third-grade alignment and
best practices in early childhood education. The latest
compilation is now available on the OCDEL website.
5. New America
Foundation adds early education to menu of blogs
Early education has
joined the ranks of hot issues like health care and climate
change at the New America Foundation. The organization recently
launched Early Education Watch, a blog
covering early education research and policy developments,
written by Sara Mead.
Recent posts have looked
at what the 2008 presidential candidates are saying - or not
saying - on early childhood education and the mainstream media's
indifference (at least, so far) to this issue in their campaign
reporting.
6. Perry Preschool
Study researcher comments on quality
In a recent commentary appearing in
Education Week, Dr. Lawrence Schweinhart, president of
the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation and one of the
lead researchers on the Perry Preschool Study, described the
five ingredients he believes all pre-k programs must have if
they are to achieve long-term benefits.
His ingredients include:
Ensuring that
children in low-income families have access;
Providing programs
with qualified teachers - those with bachelor's degrees and
training in child development or a related field - and
supporting them with ongoing, systematic, research-based
professional development experiences;
Using a curriculum
that covers all aspects of children's development and has proven
its effectiveness;
Engaging parents
and family members so that classroom learning is supported by
activities at home, and vice versa; and
Assessing program
quality and children's development continuously, preferably
through systematic observation.
7. Learning from
center directors' experience in a state pre-k program
The Center for the Study
of Child Care Employment at the University of California,
Berkeley recently released their study (PDF) of the experiences
of community-based providers participating in the Abbott
Preschool Program in New Jersey.
The report, based on
interviews with 98 directors of child care and Head Start
centers, discusses the directors' motivation for being a part of
a state pre-k program, the benefits and challenges of
collaborating with the public school system, and lessons learned
throughout their experiences. The findings are instructive for
centers and districts in any state, not just New Jersey.
Here are some of the
benefits and challenges reported by center directors.
Benefits:
By virtue of being
part of a larger pre-k effort and connected to school districts,
center directors became a part of a professional network and
were able to tap into a pool of resources, services, and experts
that were not available to them before.
With
Abbott's high standards and high level of financial and
technical support, center directors saw collaboration as an
opportunity to increase quality, especially in their workforce.
While some directors said that some existing staff had to be
reassigned, demoted, or let go due to higher
teacher-qualification requirements, most reported an increase in
staff stability due to Abbott's better compensation for
teachers and greater financial resources for training and
education. In fact, the experience of Abbott teachers
led to an increased interest in professional development
opportunities among teaching assistants, non-Abbott staff, and
the directors themselves.
Challenges:
In some cases,
center directors had to employ new teachers who had higher
education but less experience.
Directors had to
work to build staff cohesion between Abbott and
non-Abbott teachers.
Directors had to
deal with additional and more complex administrative
responsibilities such as budgeting, reporting, and meeting new
and sometimes conflicting regulations.
Some school
districts failed to value the experience and expertise in early
childhood education possessed by center directors and their
staff.
The report concludes
with seven recommendations that address the above challenges. It
should be noted that while the 98 directors interviewed worked
in centers across the state and within diverse communities, they
were not randomly selected and, consequently, are not a
representative sample of center directors in the Abbott
program.
8. Study informs
development of early childhood educator competencies
A second report (PDF) from the Center for
the Study of Child Care Employment focuses on early childhood
educator (ECE) competencies - a common set of skills and
knowledge that all early childhood professionals should possess.
While the study was done to inform California's effort in this
area, other states can learn from the process by which the study
was done as well as its findings.
The researchers reviewed
the eight most common ECE competencies in ten states (chosen
because of their quality work on this issue) and, then,
conducted online surveys and public meetings throughout
California to solicit feedback from the field. The researchers
were most interested in whether the states had defined the
appropriate domains of expertise for ECE teachers (e.g.,
curriculum development, assessment and observation, etc.); the
appropriate levels of competencies (e.g., organized by job
titles, education levels, or "stage of career"); and the
appropriate age group of children to which the competencies
applied.
While the study captured
the range of opinions on the eight domains of competencies, it
also revealed some commonly-held attitudes and beliefs, such as:
Most states'
description of ECE competencies lack an adequate focus on
working with diversity, particularly in terms of language,
culture, and learning needs.
Competencies should
apply to educators who work with infants and toddlers - not just
pre-k children and early elementary students.
After competencies
are articulated, the assistance and resources needed to reach
them must be provided.
Descriptions of
competencies should be "living documents" that are to be updated
and reviewed as new research, knowledge, and experience are
acquired.
9. Study connects
working environment with learning environment
A recent study (PDF) demonstrates that
the working environments experienced by early education
professionals could be related to learning environments inside
the classroom.
Researchers collected
data from 30 early childhood centers and examined the
relationship between the quality of the learning environments
(as measured by the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale)
and the centers' "organizational climate" and "leadership and
management practices." The study found that the quality of both
the work environment and a center's administrative practices
were related to the quality of the classroom environment. In
addition, center directors with more education and training were
rated higher in their leadership and management skills.
These results suggest
that when devising ways to improve program quality, such as
quality rating systems, the overall work environment and
directors' practices need to be taken into account along with
the environment inside the classroom.
10. Pre-k investments
related to elementary math scores, study finds
A recent study in Educational
Research and Evaluation suggests that there is a modest but
significant relationship between a country's expenditures on
pre-k and the math and science achievement of its elementary
school students.
Using fourth graders'
scores from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science
Study (TIMMS), researchers examined the extent to which
differences in achievement in seven countries - Australia,
Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, the United Kingdom,
and the United States - can be attributed to differences in the
nations' financial investments in pre-k. Their analysis turned
up evidence that pre-k expenditure levels do explain some of the
differences in fourth-grade scores.
For instance, the
average fourth grader in the Netherlands outscores the average
U.S. fourth grader by seven points on TIMMS. Even when family
backgrounds and school characteristics are taken into
consideration, the student in the Netherlands retains an
advantage. However, when pre-k expenditures are considered, the
scores equalize, suggesting that the superior performance of
students in the Netherlands is partly related to the country's
investment in pre-k.
The study also showed
that taking other social expenditures into consideration does
not weaken the relationship between pre-k spending and test
scores. This evidence further reinforces the idea that an
investment in pre-k - in and of itself - has a positive impact
on test scores.
To minimize the
possibility that an observed relationship between pre-k spending
and test scores was due to other factors, researchers took into
account differences in child, family, teacher, and school
characteristics as well as countries' expenditures on primary
education and other social programs. One significant limitation
of the study was its failure to include parental education - one
of the most powerful predictors of children's test scores - as a
background variable. It is unclear whether the relationship
between pre-k spending and test scores would have been weakened
if this variable had been considered in the analysis.
11. Economists find
investments in early childhood programs benefit the U.S. economy
Two studies commissioned by the
Partnership for America's Economic Success (PAES), provide
further evidence that investments in early childhood programs
have economic benefits for states and the whole nation.
In one of the studies,
economists examined the benefits of a national program modeled
after the Abecedarian Project. They determined that such a
program would increase the nation's productivity, raising its
gross domestic product by 1.1 percent and increasing government
revenues by $264 billion after 75 years. In the other study, an
economist found that providing pre-k for all would create 3.3
million jobs and generate $365 billion in government revenues
over 75 years. Importantly, a national pre-k program would be
significantly more cost-effective than other
economic-development policies. High-quality pre-k for all
children in the nation would ultimately return more than $3 for
every dollar invested, compared to a return of 65 cents for each
dollar spent on tax subsidies.
PAES presented these and
other findings on early childhood investments at their West Coast Economic Forum on Early
Childhood Investment.
12. Congress gets
crash course on early childhood development
Last May, House Speaker
Nancy Pelosi organized the National Summit on America's Children
to highlight what we, as a nation, know about early childhood
development and what role the government should take in
supporting it. Bringing together scientists, business leaders,
physicians, economists, and program administrators, the summit
prompted a report summarizing the day's
presentations and discussions.
It concludes:
"We now have the basis
to make informed decisions that will significantly affect the
future of our children, our families, our economy, and our
society. The combination of recent findings from neuroscience,
early intervention studies, and program evaluation provides
excellent guidance for designing policy and directing resources
to ensure children's healthy development."
With a plethora of data
and evidence, the report demonstrates that from the prenatal
period on, all young children need high-quality environments
that are supportive and nurturing, be they in their homes,
schools, child care, or other community settings. It further
discusses lessons learned in three key areas: healthy births and
positive physical and mental health; parent supports and early
childhood care and education; and family economic security.
From these lessons,
policy recommendations were developed in such areas as prenatal
care, health and mental health care, food programs, housing,
parenting support, early care and education, and economic
support for families. The report also includes concrete
recomendations for elected officials at all levels of government
to implement in their own communities.
13. Hawaii report
discusses school readiness in the Aloha State
The Center on the Family
at the University of Hawaii, Honolulu, has released a report (PDF) proposing a
definition of school readiness that encompasses the child, his
or her family, the early education setting, the school, and the
community.
It advocates for
improving early childhood programs in terms of both structures
(e.g., teacher education, class size) and process (e.g.,
adult-child relationship, use of supportive and appropriate
learning experiences). Other recommendations include providing
prevention and intervention programs for the most vulnerable
children and families and expanding access to quality early
education programs for all families - beginning with those most
in need.
To ensure you receive
your Pre-K Now emails, please add info@preknow.org to your
address book now.
Did you receive this
message from a friend? Sign up for the Pre-K Picks and other
updates!
This message was sent to [email address]. Visit your subscription management page to modify your email communication preferences or update your personal profile. To stop ALL email from Pre-K Now, click to remove yourself from our lists (or reply via email with "remove or unsubscribe" in the subject line).
Pre-K Now
1025 F
Street NW
Suite 900
Washington, DC
20004
www.preknow.org