4. New video on developmentally appropriate
practice
The National Association
for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) released an updated
statement on "Developmentally Appropriate Practice"
(DAP) earlier this year to provide the field with research-based
guidelines and principles for working with young children.
Recently, NAEYC produced a video to illustrate what DAP looks like in
classrooms.
In addition to examples of teacher-child
interactions and classroom activities, the video also includes
narration and commentary by early childhood experts. This NAEYC
resource also provides a user's guide to help viewers reflect on
and improve their own practice.
5. One-stop compilation of resources on
federal recovery funds and pre-k
Over the past few months,
Pre-K Now has joined the growing number of national
organizations compiling information about the use of funds from
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act for pre-k and early
childhood programs. After conducting a series of briefing calls
on the subject and compiling the most helpful resources, Pre-K Now posted them in one central
location. Topics covered include:
In addition to original
Pre-K Now tools and analysis, the site features helpful
materials from the Birth to Five Policy Alliance, NACCRRA,
NAEYC, ZERO TO THREE, as well as the U.S. Department of
Education and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Visitors to Recovery
Round-Up can also
obtain examples of strategies used and guidance issued by state
agencies and advocacy organizations to encourage use of ARRA
funds on early education.
6. Implications of increasing diversity for
early education
A paper (PDF) by ZERO TO THREE examines the
increasing cultural diversity in the United States and its
implications for early education professionals. In particular,
the author raises the challenging question of how to address
instances when conventional understanding of "best practices"
and "healthy" development conflicts with beliefs and behaviors
of minority cultures.
The paper also includes an extensive
bibliography of early childhood studies that include culturally
diverse children in their samples. The studies are organized by
their respective focus on cognitive development, language
development, and social-emotional development.
7. Reports show that quality of child care
needs attention
Two related reports from the National
Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies
(NACCRRA) conclude that while states have made some progress in
improving the quality standards of licensed child care centers
in the past two years, on average, they continue to hold a low
bar for quality, especially when compared to state pre-k
regulations. Both of these reports include state profiles and an
assessment of each state's strengths, weaknesses, and areas for
improvement.
In "We Can Do
Better", NACCRRA
compiled states' standards for more than 20 indicators of
quality related to oversight and regulations and found that only
Oklahoma, Tennessee, the District of Columbia, and the
Department of Defense child care systems scored a 70 percent or
above. All other states reviewed in the report earn the
equivalent of a D or F.
The standards states were most likely to
meet related to health and safety issues. Least likely to be met
were standards associated with adequate education requirements
for child care directors, teachers, and licensing staff. Many
states also do not follow national standards for staff-child
ratios or require teachers to provide a comprehensive experience
that addresses the full range of developmental
areas.
The second report, "Unequal Opportunities for Preschoolers,"
compares standards for child care with those for state pre-k and
Head Start across five areas: learning standards, group size,
adult-child ratio, lead teacher's education level, and ongoing
professional development. The report finds that three and four
year olds enrolled in licensed child care programs that are not
associated with a given state's pre-k system are more likely to
experience lower levels of quality than those children in pre-k
or Head Start programs.
8. Early childhood data: where to find them
and why they matter
If you're in search of
early childhood data but don't know where to find it, consider
browsing the guide recently compiled by Research Connections.
This resource includes almost 50 large datasets related to early
care and education. Each dataset is organized by four general
areas: Children and Child Development; Parents and Families;
Provider, Workforce, and Market; and Programs, Interventions,
and Curricula.
If you need yet more data,
check out KIDS COUNT which recently expanded their database to include more information on immigrant children.
The Children's Defense
Fund also compiled data from various sources' state-by-state early
childhood statistics, such as the proportion of working parents,
teacher and child care worker earnings, and cost of child care
as compared to cost of in-state college
tuition.
Given this proliferation of early childhood
data, one might wonder about current efforts to use this
information for program improvement. Here are two examples of
state and national plans to do just that:
-
The Connecticut Early
Childhood Investment Initiative added a "Data Matters" section
to its website to connect visitors to state and national
metrics on children and families and state-level reports,
including those related to the development of its early
childhood longitudinal data
system.
-
The Data Quality Campaign
(DQC), which has been working around the country to support
state efforts to develop longitudinal data systems at the K-12
level, has added more early childhood content to its website. One interesting data point featured on
DQC's is the number of states
that assign unique child identifiers to pre-k and early
childhood programs in various
settings.
9. Guidance on conducting screenings in
early education
A new brief from the Technical Assistance Center on
Social Emotional Intervention discusses the practice of
"universal screening" to detect the need for social-emotional
interventions with young children. The authors provide helpful
guidance on the use of screening instruments and questions early
childhood programs need to consider things such as:
-
Universal screening and monitoring of all
children using authentic assessments (e.g. observations, work
samples);
-
Evidence-based practices and
interventions;
-
Using and implementing practices and
interventions the way they were intended;
-
Collaborative problem-solving that involves
teachers, parents and other service providers;
and
-
Engaging parents and family members in the
process.
The brief emphasizes that while screening
can help identify children who may need additional services, it
is not meant to diagnose disabilities or disorders, or to serve
as the basis of decisions about special education
placement.
Another important recommendation: even
though such screenings are used to assess children's
social-emotional development, the evaluation process should also
examine other domains, such as cognitive, language, and physical
development. The brief describes eight qualities of
developmentally appropriate assessment and provides both
guidelines for developing a screening program and profiles of
sample instruments.
An increasingly common
screening program to identify special needs among pre-k children
is Response to Intervention (RTI), which was originally designed
for older children. The National Center for Learning
Disabilities has produced a report that provides nine steps to implementing RTI
in pre-k settings and examples from programs around the country
that are using the RTI model.
The major components of Pre-K RTI
include:
-
Create an entity for
diverse stakeholders (e.g., public schools, early childhood
providers, higher education, health and human services, etc.) to
develop a common vision and coordinate actions that increase
alignment of early childhood efforts across settings and with
the K-12 system.
-
Align standards,
curricula and assessment tools from pre-k through the early
elementary grades.
-
Build data systems
that allow longitudinal assessment of children's progress in
various cognitive, physical, and social-emotional
domains.
-
Provide professional development (both pre-
and in-service) for teachers, paraprofessionals, and
administrators so that all staff are oriented and trained in the
aligned approach to educating young
children.
10. New review of research on brain
development available
A recent brief (PDF) from the National Institute for Early
Education Research examines the science of brain development and
its implications for young children. In summary: while brain
development is a lifelong process that allows for ongoing
learning of new skills and adaptation to changes even late in
life, the brain is most malleable in the early childhood years
when its processes are much more fluid and more susceptible to
environmental influences and simulation -- both positive and
negative.
For this reason, homes and early childhood
settings with interactive, responsive and engaging adults and
peers contribute to healthy brain development. It also means
that preventing developmental difficulties is easier when
identified in younger children. The brief explains that while
various regions of the brain have specialized functions (e.g.,
emotion, memory), they are extremely interconnected. As a
result, experiences and programs that foster cognitive
development have the potential to affect social-emotional
development, and vice versa.
11. Experiment shows executive functions
are teachable and transferrable
The topic of executive functions (EF) is a
growing area of research in early education. EF refers to
various cognitive skills that are critical to one's ability to
focus on goals and solve problems.
A study (PDF) by Swedish researchers focused on two
EF skills: memory and inhibitory control (the ability to
regulate one's own thinking and behavior). The researchers
wanted to know if explicit training can help young children get
better at these skills and if so, whether they could then
perform better in a set of different tasks that required
EF.
The study divided 65 four year olds
randomly into treatment and control groups.
The researchers found that training did
improve children's working memory and inhibitory control.
However, when presented with new EF-related tasks, only children
exposed to training in working memory performed significantly
better than the control groups. These findings suggest not only
that EF skills can be taught but also that they are
transferrable to cognitive tasks that children have never done
before.
More articles on the early development of executive
functions appear in the January 2009 issue of Developmental
Science.
12. Researchers discuss the state of
cost-benefit research in early education
In March, many of the
country's leading experts in early education came together at
the National Academies to discuss the current state of the
science behind conducting cost-benefit analyses in early
childhood interventions. The presentations,
available online, cover a range of topics including
methodological challenges, putting monetary values to various
costs and benefits from early childhood programs, the ability to
generalize cost-benefit analyses to a wide array of early
childhood programs, and policy implications. For a quick
overview of the day's discussion, the introductory and
concluding presentations may be especially
helpful.
13. Local pre-k evaluations show promising
results
Two recent studies of pre-k programs in
Montgomery County, Maryland, and Chicago, Illinois reveal
findings that may be instructive for other early education
programs.
The evaluation
(PDF) conducted by the Montgomery County Public Schools in
Maryland examined whether children in full-day Head Start
programs achieved greater gains than those in half-day Head
Start or half-day public school pre-k programs. After
controlling for demographics such as family income, special
education status, English language learner status, and gender,
the researchers found that:
-
Children in full-day
Head Start programs outperformed those in half-day Head Start
programs in early reading, but not in early
math;
-
Children in full-day
programs outperformed half-day programs in public schools in
both early reading and early math; and
-
Three subgroups of children -- females,
Latinos, and English language learners -- seem to benefit the
most from full-day pre-k programs.
Since this evaluation was not a randomized,
controlled study, it is unclear to what extent the results
reflect differences in effectiveness between a full-day or a
half-day program, or if other factors came into play. For
instance, the programs that extended their number of hours chose
to do so voluntarily. It is possible that some unobserved
differences between these programs and those that chose the
half-day model had an effect on the outcomes.
The second study (PDF), conducted by Mathematica, examined the
characteristics of children, teachers and classrooms in
Chicago's early childhood programs for four year olds and the
progress that these children made during the pre-k year. Three
types of programs were included in the study: half-day Head
Start programs, full-day programs that blended Head Start and
child care funds, and half-day state-funded pre-k programs. The
study found that children in all programs made significant gains
in literacy, math, and social-emotional skills during their
pre-k year, but improvements in math skills were more modest.
This may be related to the finding that although teachers
reported that they frequently organized math activities,
classroom observations noted that only 22 percent of classrooms
engaged in these activities. The goal of this study was to
describe the relationships among children, teacher, and program
variables rather than explain them. As a result, it is not
possible to attribute any benefits experienced by the children
to characteristics of the programs or
teachers.
14. New online resources on infant-toddler
policy
ZERO TO THREE (ZTT) has put together a
collection of online resources to help improve public policies
that impact infants, toddlers, and their
families.
The first is an
articulation of a policy
agenda, that includes
good health (both physical and social-emotional), strong
families (including family leave and home visiting policies),
positive early learning experiences (including child care, Early
Head Start, and early intervention), and systems building
work.
The second resource is a
policy
guide that provides
advocacy tools and policy options for each of the aforementioned
areas. One of the tools, for instance, is an assessment
checklist to help advocates and policymakers gauge the standing
of their state in the four policy areas. Finally, the ZTT
website now offers a searchable database of infant-toddler policies in all 50 states
and the District of Columbia.
To ensure you receive your
Pre-K Now emails, please add info@preknow.org to your address
book now.
Did you receive this
message from a friend? Sign up for
the Pre-K Picks and other updates!
This message was sent to [email address]. Visit your subscription management page to modify your email communication preferences or update your personal profile. To stop receiving Pre-K Picks and Post, click to unsubscribe. To stop ALL email from Pre-K Now, click to remove yourself from our lists (or reply via email with "remove or unsubscribe" in the subject line).
Pre-K Now, a campaign of
the Pew center on the States
901 E Street NW
10th
Floor
Washington, DC 20004